add commentary about skills

[juecd]

Add links to kernel skills in docs

---

Note

Low Risk
Low risk documentation-only change that adds new navigation entries and MDX pages linking out to external skills.sh content.

Overview
Adds a new Agent Skills section to the docs navigation (docs.json) with pages for an overview plus two skills.

Introduces skills/overview.mdx, skills/bot-detection.mdx, and skills/profiles.mdx, primarily to link readers to the corresponding Kernel skills (including external skills.sh URLs).

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 17954f9. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[firetiger-agent]

Firetiger deploy monitoring skipped

This PR didn't match the auto-monitor filter configured on your GitHub connection:

Any PR that changes the kernel API. Monitor changes to API endpoints (packages/api/cmd/api/) and Temporal workflows (packages/api/lib/temporal) in the kernel repo

Reason: PR only adds documentation/commentary about skills, not changes to API endpoints or Temporal workflows.

To monitor this PR anyway, reply with @firetiger monitor this.

[cursor]

Risk assessment: Very Low

This PR only adds a Mintlify navigation group in docs.json and three small skills/*.mdx documentation pages. I don’t see changes to production codepaths, prompts used by model behavior, auth/permissions, infrastructure, schemas, or shared runtime systems. No CODEOWNERS file was present in the repo, and the PR had no prior approvals when checked.

  

_{Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers}

[mintlify]

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
Kernel	🟢 Ready	View Preview	Apr 29, 2026, 9:25 PM

💡 Tip: Enable Workflows to automatically generate PRs for you.

[cursor]

Risk assessment: Very Low

The updated diff only adds a Mintlify navigation entry and three small skills/*.mdx documentation pages, with the synchronized commit changing one docs page title from Bot Detection Profiler to Bot Detection. I don’t see production codepaths, prompt/system-instruction files, auth/permissions, infrastructure, schemas, or shared runtime behavior being modified.

The PR already has an approval from a prior automation review, and this update doesn’t increase risk, so I’m leaving that approval in place and not re-approving.

  

_{Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers}